Keep at it, Adam! I’ve been watching the impact of the anything-but-treatment-let-them-decrease-the-surplus-population approach for over 20 years, and the big question is, IF IT SAVES LIVES, WHY ARE PEOPLE STILL DYING?
Keep at it, Adam! I’ve been watching the impact of the anything-but-treatment-let-them-decrease-the-surplus-population approach for over 20 years, and the big question is, IF IT SAVES LIVES, WHY ARE PEOPLE STILL DYING?
Their logic in such circumstances is usually something along the lines of “sure, more people are dying now, but it would have been even worse without our policies in place” or “we were only able to implement part of our plan, and the real magic will happen if you let us implement the full plan”. Either way, totally delusional and unsupported by any evidence.
Keep at it, Adam! I’ve been watching the impact of the anything-but-treatment-let-them-decrease-the-surplus-population approach for over 20 years, and the big question is, IF IT SAVES LIVES, WHY ARE PEOPLE STILL DYING?
Their logic in such circumstances is usually something along the lines of “sure, more people are dying now, but it would have been even worse without our policies in place” or “we were only able to implement part of our plan, and the real magic will happen if you let us implement the full plan”. Either way, totally delusional and unsupported by any evidence.