💯 If I could only keep one subscription, this would be the one! And that's not meant as flattery, although it could be interpreted as such. It seems to always come down to a minute number of people who provide the impetus for great change and this appears to be the case again here. As infuriating as it has been as ever more details come to light regarding CCP/triad influence and criminal operations in our country and in fact across the globe (let alone the horrors they subject their own population to), it's also been inspiring and motivating in the sense that seemingly more and more people have become truly impassioned in their wanting to defend our democracy from such threats. The exposure of these events and the changes we will hopefully see as a result warrant more thanks than can probably ever be given! 🇨🇦💪🙏
Are we really "without laws" if the Criminal Code definition of "high treason" refers not only to acts of war, but to "any act preparatory" to war? Would seeking to control the selection of leaders who might or might not occupy the office of PM or Premier and other offices not potentially be an act preparatory to war or anticipated war, as controlling a country's leadership determines whether or not it will be able or willing to defend itself. If I were a senior Liberal cabinet minister who had engaged in diminishment, deflection and diversion in relation to CSIS intelligence assessments, and had potentially facilitated acts preparatory to war in this sense, I would not be sleeping well tonight in light of this CC definition which potentially leads to life imprisonment.
On top of everything else, it's also very redeeming to see the obscene racist nature of the CCP regime exposed, along with its astonishing hypocrisy as it purports, for example, to support the struggle for equal rights of minorities in Western nations when in fact their purposes much more centre around stoking the flames of racial hatred and division. Xi's proclamation that "Chinese blood" binds the nation and its diaspora inseparably together must be interpreted with the corresponding necessary gravity that the real world embodiments of his remarks entail (see: "no force" will stop the reunification of Taiwan with "the motherland"). The horrors of the practical implementation of extreme Han ethnic nationalism as observed in the brutal repression of minorities found within China's borders as well as members of those minorities living abroad, in addition to its effects on people belonging to the main ethnic groups themselves (ex. the intimidation of various population segments in Canada such as the students and seniors mentioned in this piece) are examples of this. Canada and other Western democracies have a duty to their citizens, as well as temporary residents (as much as possible, anyways), to protect them from this corrosive, nefarious and threatening ideological regime and its enforcers.
My subscription to the Bureau,and substack is the best money I have ever spent. Thank you Sam Cooper!!!
💯 If I could only keep one subscription, this would be the one! And that's not meant as flattery, although it could be interpreted as such. It seems to always come down to a minute number of people who provide the impetus for great change and this appears to be the case again here. As infuriating as it has been as ever more details come to light regarding CCP/triad influence and criminal operations in our country and in fact across the globe (let alone the horrors they subject their own population to), it's also been inspiring and motivating in the sense that seemingly more and more people have become truly impassioned in their wanting to defend our democracy from such threats. The exposure of these events and the changes we will hopefully see as a result warrant more thanks than can probably ever be given! 🇨🇦💪🙏
💯 agree
There are many similarities with the alignment of the WEF's agenda and the WHO.
Was it Solzhenitsyn who said 'we know they're lying. They know we know they're lying. We know they know we know they're lying. But still they lie.'
Do you think it is possible that other countries are attempting to have political influence as well ?
Are we really "without laws" if the Criminal Code definition of "high treason" refers not only to acts of war, but to "any act preparatory" to war? Would seeking to control the selection of leaders who might or might not occupy the office of PM or Premier and other offices not potentially be an act preparatory to war or anticipated war, as controlling a country's leadership determines whether or not it will be able or willing to defend itself. If I were a senior Liberal cabinet minister who had engaged in diminishment, deflection and diversion in relation to CSIS intelligence assessments, and had potentially facilitated acts preparatory to war in this sense, I would not be sleeping well tonight in light of this CC definition which potentially leads to life imprisonment.
On top of everything else, it's also very redeeming to see the obscene racist nature of the CCP regime exposed, along with its astonishing hypocrisy as it purports, for example, to support the struggle for equal rights of minorities in Western nations when in fact their purposes much more centre around stoking the flames of racial hatred and division. Xi's proclamation that "Chinese blood" binds the nation and its diaspora inseparably together must be interpreted with the corresponding necessary gravity that the real world embodiments of his remarks entail (see: "no force" will stop the reunification of Taiwan with "the motherland"). The horrors of the practical implementation of extreme Han ethnic nationalism as observed in the brutal repression of minorities found within China's borders as well as members of those minorities living abroad, in addition to its effects on people belonging to the main ethnic groups themselves (ex. the intimidation of various population segments in Canada such as the students and seniors mentioned in this piece) are examples of this. Canada and other Western democracies have a duty to their citizens, as well as temporary residents (as much as possible, anyways), to protect them from this corrosive, nefarious and threatening ideological regime and its enforcers.