11 Comments

Anyone paying attention should know this bu the population of Canada is willfully blind.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the refresher, Sam!

Expand full comment

If CSIS can’t persuade the top politicians to pay attention, what then? Essentially there are no consequences. Bring Cash could become Canada’s motto. PP may already be defeated because his main slogan has been Carbon Tax Carney.

Expand full comment

But Mark Carney is following all the rules?! Haha 👍 😄 at what point do we the people need to start mobilizing around this dumpster fire aka Canadian politics

Expand full comment

BC is a write off as the CCP has infiltrated so deeply that no one can win if they denounce the Chinese Communist Party. The fact Carney is engaged deeply with them as well should worry all Canadians.

Expand full comment

I don't think most Canadians even know that Carney is deeply engaged with China as the legacy media tends to stay away from that.

Expand full comment
Mar 19Edited

From China Briefing analyzing the benefits to China of a Carney or Poilievre government. It says that Carney met with President Xi numerous times, most recently in 2024 as Chairman of Brookfield. You already know who they want.

https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-canada-relations-trade-business-leadership-change/

Expand full comment

Are this mysterious senior politician's initials "DE", Sam? If not, it's hard to imagine who else it would be. That person DOES have very close relationship with a certain DG, Mandarin TV personality and sometime spokesman for the Vancouver consulate.

Expand full comment

I think there can be no doubt this senior politician is "DE". He has made no move to stop the inflow of fentanyl precursors through our ports, his excuse? It's a federal responsibility. Well that certain hasn't stopped other premiers from securing their border with the US, so why has DE taken such a hands off approach. Just thinking. lol

Expand full comment

So right, Carol.

Expand full comment

I'm glad you have re-posted this, Sam. It's equally as relevant and jaw-dropping as it was the first time. No wonder J. Hogue's mandate was limited to pre-2022 elections. "They" were less open and brazen about their efforts in those days.

Expand full comment